You CAN’T stop kids finding out about sex. You CAN at least make sure some of what they hear is sane and reasonable … And as for alternative sexuality in Dr Who - oh for goodness sake! There are kids watching out there, who already know they’re gay. Doesn’t it do them good to have a hero like a Captain Jack?

Steven Moffat

(via yousillyqueer)

Well said, Steven!

(via cheekbonesofbenny)

(via i-am-les-miserables)

winterlark:

if being 100% gay is playing for the other team then i’d like to imagine being pansexual as playing for every team. you just sort of run around between the in and outfields juggling the extra balls and sit a couple innings in the audience eating a hotdog and eventually everyone starts to question whether you even know how to play baseball or not

OMFG, ABBY, LOOK AT THIS POST.

(via fireandiceandrageandfrogs)

aelora:

I love you Jane Lynch.

(via coreycurtaincall)

let's get a few things straight.

  • bisexual with a preference for the same sex does not mean "one foot out of the closet."
  • bisexual with a preference for the opposite sex does not mean "trying to get attention."
  • lesbian does not mean "masculine."
  • gay does not mean "feminine."
  • transgender does not mean "going through a phase."
  • transsexual does not mean "a disappointment." nor does it mean "gender identity confusion."
  • asexual does not mean "prude."
  • demisexual does not mean "prude."
  • objectsexual does not mean "mentally ill."
  • pansexual does not mean "easy."

sweetlittlekitty:

goatzee:

equiuszahhak:

the “phenomenon” of asexuality

whoa those crazy asexuals. not wanting sex. that’s Weird

Watch out, i might not sex You up any second

WATCH OUT

THEY’RE NOT COMING FOR YOU

(via eyesfilledwithstars)

pagan-posts:

wasabikun:

bellasparse:

My body is not shameful
Just because you’re uncomfortable doesn’t mean you have to make me feel bad that I’m not

I normally wouldn’t reblog real boobs, but this is a good message.

Love this and will always reblog.

pagan-posts:

wasabikun:

bellasparse:

My body is not shameful

Just because you’re uncomfortable doesn’t mean you have to make me feel bad that I’m not

I normally wouldn’t reblog real boobs, but this is a good message.

Love this and will always reblog.

(via fireandiceandrageandfrogs)

whoavengelock:

gallifrey-feels:

onceupond:

Doctor Who: Gay Subtlety 

Because actually, it’s not a big deal. 

ARE YOU HEARING THIS, QUEERBAITERS?

Because equality isn’t about making a fuss about sexuality, it’s about treating it like we would with any other. casual, simple, and calm; no worries.

(via kayladaila)

thewholockiansareinthetardis:

winterlark:

if being 100% gay is playing for the other team then i’d like to imagine being pansexual as playing for every team. you just sort of run around between the in and outfields juggling the extra balls and sit a couple innings in the audience eating a hotdog and eventually everyone starts to question whether you even know how to play baseball or not

this may be the most accurate description i’ve ever read

(via endlesslydeathx)

Sherlock's sexuality.

  • Steven Moffat: Sherlock wants sex with women. He just abstains from it.
  • Benedict Cumberbatch: Sherlock's straight, he just has a bromance with John.
  • Martin Freeman: Sherlock and John...They're in love.
  • Mark Gatiss: SHERLOCK'S GAY FOR JOHN. THEY COMPLETE EACH OTHER. FORGET SUBTEXT, LET'S JUST MAKE IT HOMOEROTIC.
  • #ON A SCALE OF MOFFAT TO GATISS HOW MUCH DO YOU SHIP THEM
charlotteness:

heylauren:

BECAUSE GENITALS.

oh the glory of this answer. 

charlotteness:

heylauren:

BECAUSE GENITALS.

oh the glory of this answer. 

(via fireandiceandrageandfrogs)

Sexuality is so weird, that’s why I ignore it most days. It’s just easier to realize that we fall in love with PEOPLE based on their PEOPLENESS and we are attraced to PEOPLE based on their PEOPLENESS and then we find PEOPLES who’s PEOPLENESS is our favorite and we stick with ‘em… that’s all it is… PeopleNess. — Dannielle from EveryoneisGay (via juliarese)

(via fireandiceandrageandfrogs)

dasdeutschtard:

noraepi:

yamino:

artoftransliness:

transissues101:

To me this depiction of gender is much more accurate, and allows us to label ourselves anywhere on an infinite spectrum. Instead of putting ourselves on fine lines whilst calling anything off the line abnormal, we can be labeled anything therefor allowing any form of gender expression to be considered normal.

Interesting model for viewing gender. 

Lately I’ve been thinking about gender spectrums and if it would be possible to accurately visualize.  I like this model.  I think I’d be somewhere in the grey/yellow-orange border.

If anyone who is an expert of gender identity could explain what all these terms mean, that would be wonderful!

HI THERE! okay so I’m guessing you know what “male” and “female” are lololol.
SO. A lot of these more wibbly-wobbly terms are more specific to the person who uses it as an identifier, but this is what they mean when I talk about them.
Genderqueer: Close to Androgyne, but not quite. Genderqueer is also somewhere in the “middle” of “male” and “female”(to put it in binary terms), but not necessarily looking for true androgynous presentations/actions. A genderqueer person molds “male” gender things and “female” gender things, and there can be an equal balance or the two following gender descriptions. And even some this diagram hasn’t thought of!
GQ male/male GQ: someone who identifies as genderqueer(when I explain it with binary terms, “somewhere in the middle of the male/female dichotomy”) but feels more on the male side of the spectrum.
GQ female/female GQ: someone who identifies as genderqueer but feels more on the female side of the spectrum.
Neutrois: identifying with a neutral gender, one that’s not really male/female/other at all.
Androgyne: someone who identifies as androgynous, “in the middle” of the “two” genders, as you can sort of see from this diagram, it’s kinda ‘directly’ in between “male” and “female”
Genderless: someone who rejects the concepts of gender, binary or otherwise, altogether, and does not identify with a gender at all.
Pangender: someone who identifies as pangender identifies with parts of “all” the genders, they don’t really label them as “male” or “female” or “genderqueer”, instead combining all of it into one amalgam of “human”

dasdeutschtard:

noraepi:

yamino:

artoftransliness:

transissues101:

To me this depiction of gender is much more accurate, and allows us to label ourselves anywhere on an infinite spectrum. Instead of putting ourselves on fine lines whilst calling anything off the line abnormal, we can be labeled anything therefor allowing any form of gender expression to be considered normal.

Interesting model for viewing gender. 

Lately I’ve been thinking about gender spectrums and if it would be possible to accurately visualize.  I like this model.  I think I’d be somewhere in the grey/yellow-orange border.

If anyone who is an expert of gender identity could explain what all these terms mean, that would be wonderful!

HI THERE! okay so I’m guessing you know what “male” and “female” are lololol.

SO. A lot of these more wibbly-wobbly terms are more specific to the person who uses it as an identifier, but this is what they mean when I talk about them.

Genderqueer: Close to Androgyne, but not quite. Genderqueer is also somewhere in the “middle” of “male” and “female”(to put it in binary terms), but not necessarily looking for true androgynous presentations/actions. A genderqueer person molds “male” gender things and “female” gender things, and there can be an equal balance or the two following gender descriptions. And even some this diagram hasn’t thought of!

GQ male/male GQ: someone who identifies as genderqueer(when I explain it with binary terms, “somewhere in the middle of the male/female dichotomy”) but feels more on the male side of the spectrum.

GQ female/female GQ: someone who identifies as genderqueer but feels more on the female side of the spectrum.

Neutrois: identifying with a neutral gender, one that’s not really male/female/other at all.

Androgyne: someone who identifies as androgynous, “in the middle” of the “two” genders, as you can sort of see from this diagram, it’s kinda ‘directly’ in between “male” and “female”

Genderless: someone who rejects the concepts of gender, binary or otherwise, altogether, and does not identify with a gender at all.

Pangender: someone who identifies as pangender identifies with parts of “all” the genders, they don’t really label them as “male” or “female” or “genderqueer”, instead combining all of it into one amalgam of “human”

(via trueamericanenglish)

feminisminapapercup:

officialteamgreen:

knowledge

“is that a boy or a girl?”
“does it matter?”
<3

feminisminapapercup:

officialteamgreen:

knowledge

“is that a boy or a girl?”

“does it matter?”

<3

(via rainwasheseverythingaway)